Close Menu
    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram Pinterest YouTube LinkedIn TikTok
    TopBuzzMagazine.com
    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram Pinterest YouTube LinkedIn TikTok
    • Home
    • Movies
    • Television
    • Music
    • Fashion
    • Books
    • Science
    • Technology
    • Cover Story
    • Contact
      • About
      • Amazon Disclaimer
      • Terms and Conditions
      • Privacy Policy
      • DMCA / Copyrights Disclaimer
    TopBuzzMagazine.com
    Home»Science»China’s ‘alien’ signal almost certainly came from humans, project researcher
    Science

    China’s ‘alien’ signal almost certainly came from humans, project researcher

    By AdminJune 23, 2022
    Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email

    Chinese scientists’ claims that their “Sky Eye” telescope could have picked up signals from intelligent aliens have been met with skepticism by an American colleague. 

    Dan Werthimer, a Search For Extraterrestrial Intelligence (SETI) researcher at the University of Berkeley, California and a coauthor on the research project (opens in new tab) which first spotted the signals, told Live Science that the narrow-band radio signals he and his fellow researchers found “are from [human] radio interference, and not from extraterrestrials.”

    Natural sources don’t typically produce narrow-band radio signals. Scientists picked up three of these signals, seemingly from space, in 2019 and 2022 using the largest radio telescope in the world — the Five-hundred-meter Aperture Spherical radio Telescope (FAST), nicknamed “Sky Eye,” which was performing a preliminary scan of exoplanets in preparation for an upcoming five-year-long sky survey.

    Related: 9 things we learned about aliens in 2021

    The news of the signals’ possible alien origins first appeared in a report published Tuesday (opens in new tab) (June 14) in the official newspaper of China’s Ministry of Science and Technology, which contained a claim that the team had discovered “several cases of possible technological traces and extraterrestrial civilizations from outside the Earth.” 

    One FAST official who was not directly involved in the research also said that an extraterrestrial origin for the signals was “likely.” 

    The claims quickly went viral, spreading across Chinese state media and the Chinese social media platform Weibo before being reported by the international press and Live Science. But Werthimer says that, while the signals are certainly artificial, they’re almost definitely from humans and not aliens.

    “The big problem, and the problem in this particular case, is that we’re looking for signals from extraterrestrials, but what we find is a zillion signals from terrestrials,” Werthimer told Live Science. “They’re very weak signals, but the cryogenic receivers on the telescopes are super sensitive and can pick up signals from cell phones, television, radar and satellites — and there are more and more satellites in the sky every day. If you’re kind of new in the game, and you don’t know all these different ways that interference can get into your data and corrupt it, it’s pretty easy to get excited.”

    In spite of this excitement, Werthimer’s Chinese collaborators were nonetheless cautious to hedge the more sensational remarks, emphasizing the ultimate likelihood that the signals originated on Earth.

    “These are several narrow-band electromagnetic signals different from the past, and the team is currently working on further investigation,” Zhang Tongjie, head scientist at the China Extraterrestrial Civilization Research Group at Beijing Normal University, said in the report. “The possibility that the suspicious signal is some kind of radio interference is also very high, and it needs to be further confirmed and ruled out. This may be a long process.” 

    The recent false alarm is one of several instances in which alien-hunting scientists have been misled by noise from human activity. In 2019, astronomers spotted a signal beamed to Earth from Proxima Centauri — the nearest star system to our sun (sitting roughly 4.2 light-years away) and home to at least one potentially habitable planet. The signal was a narrow-band radio wave typically associated with human-made objects, which led scientists to entertain the thrilling possibility that it came from alien technology. Studies released two years later, however, suggested that the signal was most likely produced by malfunctioning human equipment, Live Science previously reported. Similarly, another famous set of signals once supposed to have come from aliens, detected between 2011 and 2014, turned out to have actually been made by scientists microwaving their lunches.

    “A lot of very sophisticated astronomers looked at that and we couldn’t figure out what it was for a long time,” Werthimer said, referring to the microwave lunch incidents. “Finally, somebody figured out (opens in new tab) they were happening at lunchtime.”

    Radio interference is a big problem for a telescope like FAST precisely because of its scale and sensitivity. The 1,600-foot-diameter (500 meters) dish is powerful enough to detect radio devices like those on Earth operating many light-years away, and the data it captures contains just under 40 billion observations per second. In this setup, picking up a false positive is a lot like flipping a coin to get twenty heads in a row, Werthimer told the publication Futurism (opens in new tab) — it may seem like a remarkable outcome on its own, but not when the coin has been flipped trillions of times or more. 

    And the less history a given research team has with a particular radio telescope, the more likely it is that they won’t spot a subtle interference effect. According to Werthimer, the FAST telescope’s receiver can look at 19 different places in the sky at once. Scientists are used to ruling out interference if it shows up in all 19, but if the interference only appears in one (as it did with all three of the supposedly “alien” signatures detected in this case) even experienced researchers can be led astray. 

    With the ever-increasing numbers of satellites orbiting above our heads, Werhimer says this problem will only get worse.

    “100 years ago, we didn’t really know how to do SETI. 100 years from now, I don’t think we’ll be able to do it from the ground,” Werthimer said. “This may be a unique window in our history as Earthlings where we can do pretty good SETI searches, where not all of the possible radio bands are corrupted by our own signals.”

    The possibility also remains that if aliens are sending us, or unintentionally leaking, signals across the vast expanse of the cosmos, they may not be encoded in radio waves, but in ways that we haven’t yet developed the technology to understand.

    “It wouldn’t surprise me if we were on the wrong track. If you look at the history of SETI, the original ideas proposed around 200 years ago were things like ‘let’s build some big fires on Earth’; ‘let’s have some big mirrors that reflect sunlight to the Martians’ or ‘let’s build some mile-long right-angled triangles to show aliens we know about Pythagorean Theorem,’ and now we look back and say those guys were idiots,” Werthimer said. “So, what’s to say that 200 years from now people won’t look back at us and ask why we didn’t use tachyons or subspace communication? But you’ve got to do what you know how to do.”

    Despite the dispiriting likelihood that these signals have an Earthbound source, SETI astronomers are still fairly confident that we’re not alone in the universe. And that one day, we may dig up something real amid all of our own backchatter.

    “I think it’d be very strange if we’re the only ones. If you look at the numbers, there’s a trillion planets in the galaxy — five times more planets than there are stars. A lot of them are little dinky planets like Earth. Many of them have liquid water, so intelligent life, while not as common as bacterial life, could still be fairly common,” Werthimer said. “Maybe they don’t want to interfere with primitive civilizations like us that are still killing each other. Maybe they have us in a big zoo to look at. Or maybe they got a little tired of technology and growth and they’re more interested in music and poetry.”

    Live Science reached out to Zhang Tongjie for comment but had not heard back at the time of publication.

    Originally published on Live Science.

    Read The Full Article Here

    Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email

    Related Posts

    How government use of AI could hurt democracy

    July 12, 2025

    Wildfire forces evacuation of part of Grand Canyon

    July 11, 2025

    1,600-year-old tomb of Maya city’s first ruler unearthed in Belize

    July 11, 2025

    Peculiar plant could help us reconstruct ancient Earth’s climate

    July 10, 2025

    Chemicals from turmeric and rhubarb could help fight antibiotic-resistant bacteria lurking in wastewater

    July 10, 2025

    Metformin may prevent severe morning sickness

    July 9, 2025
    popular posts

    Remodeling the immune system to fight tuberculosis

    The Definitive Guide to Tinting Your Eyebrows at Home

    Chic Shoes, Forever Bags and Timeless Jewels: This Accessories Edit

    BookTrib’s Bites: Four Great Last-Minute Ideas for Holiday Gifts

    Interview with Golden Angel, Author of A Season for Spies

    “Summer Girl (Redux)” by The High Plains Drifters

    Jurassic World: Dominion | Little White Lies

    Categories
    • Books (3,282)
    • Cover Story (4)
    • Events (18)
    • Fashion (2,446)
    • Interviews (43)
    • Movies (2,581)
    • Music (2,859)
    • News (155)
    • Politics (1)
    • Science (4,431)
    • Technology (2,574)
    • Television (3,304)
    • Uncategorized (932)
    Archives
    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram Pinterest YouTube Reddit TikTok
    © 2025 Top Buzz Magazine. All rights reserved. All articles, images, product names, logos, and brands are property of their respective owners. All company, product and service names used in this website are for identification purposes only. Use of these names, logos, and brands does not imply endorsement unless specified. By using this site, you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.

    We use cookies on our website to give you the most relevant experience by remembering your preferences and repeat visits. By clicking “Accept”, you consent to the use of ALL the cookies.
    Do not sell my personal information.
    Cookie SettingsAccept
    Manage consent

    Privacy Overview

    This website uses cookies to improve your experience while you navigate through the website. Out of these, the cookies that are categorized as necessary are stored on your browser as they are essential for the working of basic functionalities of the website. We also use third-party cookies that help us analyze and understand how you use this website. These cookies will be stored in your browser only with your consent. You also have the option to opt-out of these cookies. But opting out of some of these cookies may affect your browsing experience.
    Necessary
    Always Enabled
    Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. These cookies ensure basic functionalities and security features of the website, anonymously.
    CookieDurationDescription
    cookielawinfo-checkbox-analytics11 monthsThis cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookie is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Analytics".
    cookielawinfo-checkbox-functional11 monthsThe cookie is set by GDPR cookie consent to record the user consent for the cookies in the category "Functional".
    cookielawinfo-checkbox-necessary11 monthsThis cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookies is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Necessary".
    cookielawinfo-checkbox-others11 monthsThis cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookie is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Other.
    cookielawinfo-checkbox-performance11 monthsThis cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookie is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Performance".
    viewed_cookie_policy11 monthsThe cookie is set by the GDPR Cookie Consent plugin and is used to store whether or not user has consented to the use of cookies. It does not store any personal data.
    Functional
    Functional cookies help to perform certain functionalities like sharing the content of the website on social media platforms, collect feedbacks, and other third-party features.
    Performance
    Performance cookies are used to understand and analyze the key performance indexes of the website which helps in delivering a better user experience for the visitors.
    Analytics
    Analytical cookies are used to understand how visitors interact with the website. These cookies help provide information on metrics the number of visitors, bounce rate, traffic source, etc.
    Advertisement
    Advertisement cookies are used to provide visitors with relevant ads and marketing campaigns. These cookies track visitors across websites and collect information to provide customized ads.
    Others
    Other uncategorized cookies are those that are being analyzed and have not been classified into a category as yet.
    SAVE & ACCEPT