A jury has found that Live Nation operated as a monopoly in violation of federal and state antitrust laws. The decision arrives following a seven-week trial and four days of deliberations. Penalties against the live-music industry giant will be decided at a later date, but they could range from significant monetary damages to a break up of Live Nation and Ticketmaster, which the former acquired in 2009. Live Nation has previously denied acting as a monopoly.
The ruling comes a month after Live Nation reached an initial settlement with the Department of Justice, which required the company to divest from 13 of its amphitheaters and cap its exclusivity contracts with venues at four years, while Ticketmaster would need to permit competitors, such as SeatGeek and Eventbrite, to sell their tickets through its platform. Notably, the tentative agreement did not require Live Nation to split from Ticketmaster, something the DOJ initially called for when the suit was filed in 2024. While seven of the plaintiff states accepted the DOJ’s terms, the attorneys general for more than 30 states stayed on the case, arguing that the terms needed to be stricter to lessen Live Nation’s market dominance.
Pitchfork has reached out to Live Nation for comment on the April 15 verdict.
In a statement, New York State Attorney General James said, “This is a landmark victory in our ongoing work to protect our economy and New Yorkers’ wallets from harmful monopolies. A jury found what we have long known to be true: Live Nation and Ticketmaster are breaking the law and costing consumers millions of dollars in the process.”
“Today’s decision is an enormous victory for fans, musicians, and independent venues everywhere, and a huge step forward in the fight for a more just live music industry,” a spokesperson for United Musicians and Allied Workers told Pitchfork, while Stephen Parker, executive director of the National Independent Venue Associaion (NIVA), shared, “Ticketmaster should not be permitted to participate in the ticket resale market. Live Nation should not be able to promote more than 50% of artists’ tours. And the damages paid to the states should be remitted to the independent venues, promoters, festivals, and fans that have suffered under Live Nation’s monopolistic reign over the last 15 years.”
Last month, the Wall Street Journal reported that President Trump personally intervened in the initial settlement with Live Nation, and that both sides hashed out the agreement at the White House on March 9, four days before it was publicly announced. On April 14, a group of U.S. Senators—Amy Klobuchar (D-MN), Elizabeth Warren (D-MA), Cory Booker (D-NJ), Richard Blumenthal (D-Ct.), Mazie Hirono (D-HI.), and Peter Welch (D-VT.)—asked the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York to reexamine the settlement and whether a deal was “made in response to political pressure,” per Variety, adding—in a nod to WSJ’s story—that “reports indicate that President Trump was even involved in efforts to settle the case and that the terms of the settlement were negotiated at the White House. No one representing the interests of consumers, fans, artists, or venues was present.”
The DOJ and the attorneys general for 38 states first filed an antitrust lawsuit against Live Nation Entertainment in 2024, alleging that the company held a monopoly over the live music industry. The suit argued that Live Nation’s exclusivity contracts, threats to rivals, and leveraging of market domination over artists breached antitrust laws, resulting in inflated prices and stifled competition.
“These service providers should work to serve the interests of artists and fans,” the suit argued. “Genuine competition for and among these service providers would generate the best, most cost-effective, and fan-friendly experience. But the world live music fans live in today is far from that.”