Close Menu
    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram Pinterest YouTube LinkedIn TikTok
    TopBuzzMagazine.com
    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram Pinterest YouTube LinkedIn TikTok
    • Home
    • Movies
    • Television
    • Music
    • Fashion
    • Books
    • Science
    • Technology
    • Cover Story
    • Contact
      • About
      • Amazon Disclaimer
      • Terms and Conditions
      • Privacy Policy
      • DMCA / Copyrights Disclaimer
    TopBuzzMagazine.com
    Home»Music»Former Marilyn Manson Accuser’s Recantation Can’t Be Evidence in Evan
    Music

    Former Marilyn Manson Accuser’s Recantation Can’t Be Evidence in Evan

    By AdminApril 3, 2023
    Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email
    Former Marilyn Manson Accuser’s Recantation Can’t Be Evidence in Evan

    Last week, in the defamation court case against Evan Rachel Wood and Illma Gore, Marilyn Manson’s legal team filed a declaration statement from Ashley Morgan Smithline. Smithline, whose sexual assault lawsuit against Manson was dismissed in January, recanted her assault allegations against Manson (aka Brian Warner) in the declaration and claimed that she was “manipulated” by Wood and Gore to make false accusations. Today, a judge denied Manson’s application to include Smithline’s declaration as evidence, court documents viewed by Pitchfork confirm.

    Shortly after Smithline’s declaration was filed, a representative for Wood released a statement in response. Wood filed a declaration herself in court on Monday, which reiterated the same points: “I never pressured or manipulated Ashley Morgan Smithline to make any accusations against Plaintiff Brian Warner, and I certainly never pressured or manipulated her to make accusations that were not true. It was Ms. Smithline who first contacted me in March 2019.” Wood submitted screenshots of alleged Instagram direct messages between Smithline and Wood as evidence.

    Wood’s attorneys also submitted email correspondence that purportedly shows a timeline where Manson’s team distributed Smithline’s declaration to media outlets on February 22, one day before it was filed in court. (A member of Manson’s legal team emailed the declaration to Pitchfork after the motion was filed.) Wood’s attorneys argued that “Smithline’s timeline is disproven by documented evidence,” that she “faced pressure and harassment after filing her federal lawsuit, including from plaintiff’s attorneys,” that the declaration is inadmissible because it was electronically “DocuSigned,” and that “Smithline does not demonstrate outrageous conduct by defendants.” They also noted that Manson’s team didn’t request to depose Smithline previously when granted the opportunity in discovery.

    After the judge asked Manson’s attorney during Tuesday’s hearing why the team didn’t seek to depose Smithline, the attorney claimed that the team didn’t because the judge denied multiple deposition requests and claimed “it wouldn’t have made a difference,” Rolling Stone reports.

    “We don’t know that,” the judge reportedly responded. “But you didn’t do it so we are where we are. Even with that, there really is no explanation as to why this is bubbling up at this time.”

    “It is unsurprising that Evan Rachel Wood is desperately fighting to keep Ashley Smithline’s testimony out of court—because she knows the truth will expose her plot to manipulate the women who trusted her in order to destroy Brian Warner,” Manson’s attorney, Howard King, said in a statement. “Brian Warner never abused anyone. Ashley Smithline has told the truth. It’s sadly predictable that Evan Rachel Wood—someone who has already filed a forged FBI letter under oath in other court proceedings—remains committed to not doing the same.”

    King also claimed that Smithline reached out to him initially, not the other way around. “I never discussed Ashley Smithline’s claims against Brian Warner until after she had reached out to me and terminated her counsel,” adding that a two-hour taped conversation between them “proves that every single thing in her declaration was taken from her words, not mine.”

    “Evan’s full of shit. That’s my comment,” Smithline told Rolling Stone. “She’s saying anything she can to discredit me.”

    Gore’s attorneys dubbed Smithline’s declaration part of Manson and his lawyers’ “public relations campaign” and an example of “frivolous litigation tactics.” They continued: “Their attempt to introduce a new declaration that provides no real evidentiary support for his case is another example of their abuse of the judicial system, and one this Court should not allow…. It is ironic that Plaintiff now urges the importance of Ms. Smithline’s declaration and credibility after he himself called her a liar for two years.”

    Pitchfork has reached out to Wood’s representatives for comment on today’s hearing.

    Read The Full Article Here

    Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email

    Related Posts

    Shop These Fall Candles Created By Elton John Online

    August 18, 2025

    Aston Villa FC Debut Mural + Pay Tribute to Ozzy Osbourne

    August 18, 2025

    Ronnie Rondell Jr., Man on Fire on Pink Floyd’s Wish You Were Here Cover, Dead at 88

    August 17, 2025

    New John Lennon and Yoko Ono Box Set Power to the People Announced

    August 17, 2025

    Charli XCX Ends ‘Brat’ Tour, Teases ‘The Moment’ Film

    August 16, 2025

    How The Funeral Portrait’s Lee Jennings Learned to Sing

    August 16, 2025
    popular posts

    Doctor’s Orders: Clear Solutions to Coping With Anxiety and Depression

    Taylor Swift on ‘Cruel Summer’ Becoming a Single Four Years

    Karen Allen on reprising Marion Ravenwood in Indiana Jones and

    Samsung Galaxy S23 Said to Debut with Qualcomm Snapdragon 8

    20 Must-Haves This Holiday Season

    Human and Neanderthal brains have a surprising ‘youthful’ quality in

    Trust Me—These Are the Best Under-Eye Concealers to Help Disguise

    Categories
    • Books (3,356)
    • Cover Story (5)
    • Events (19)
    • Fashion (2,495)
    • Interviews (43)
    • Movies (2,656)
    • Music (2,936)
    • News (156)
    • Politics (3)
    • Science (4,506)
    • Technology (2,651)
    • Television (3,381)
    • Uncategorized (932)
    Archives
    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram Pinterest YouTube Reddit TikTok
    © 2025 Top Buzz Magazine. All rights reserved. All articles, images, product names, logos, and brands are property of their respective owners. All company, product and service names used in this website are for identification purposes only. Use of these names, logos, and brands does not imply endorsement unless specified. By using this site, you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.

    We use cookies on our website to give you the most relevant experience by remembering your preferences and repeat visits. By clicking “Accept”, you consent to the use of ALL the cookies.
    Do not sell my personal information.
    Cookie SettingsAccept
    Manage consent

    Privacy Overview

    This website uses cookies to improve your experience while you navigate through the website. Out of these, the cookies that are categorized as necessary are stored on your browser as they are essential for the working of basic functionalities of the website. We also use third-party cookies that help us analyze and understand how you use this website. These cookies will be stored in your browser only with your consent. You also have the option to opt-out of these cookies. But opting out of some of these cookies may affect your browsing experience.
    Necessary
    Always Enabled
    Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. These cookies ensure basic functionalities and security features of the website, anonymously.
    CookieDurationDescription
    cookielawinfo-checkbox-analytics11 monthsThis cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookie is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Analytics".
    cookielawinfo-checkbox-functional11 monthsThe cookie is set by GDPR cookie consent to record the user consent for the cookies in the category "Functional".
    cookielawinfo-checkbox-necessary11 monthsThis cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookies is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Necessary".
    cookielawinfo-checkbox-others11 monthsThis cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookie is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Other.
    cookielawinfo-checkbox-performance11 monthsThis cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookie is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Performance".
    viewed_cookie_policy11 monthsThe cookie is set by the GDPR Cookie Consent plugin and is used to store whether or not user has consented to the use of cookies. It does not store any personal data.
    Functional
    Functional cookies help to perform certain functionalities like sharing the content of the website on social media platforms, collect feedbacks, and other third-party features.
    Performance
    Performance cookies are used to understand and analyze the key performance indexes of the website which helps in delivering a better user experience for the visitors.
    Analytics
    Analytical cookies are used to understand how visitors interact with the website. These cookies help provide information on metrics the number of visitors, bounce rate, traffic source, etc.
    Advertisement
    Advertisement cookies are used to provide visitors with relevant ads and marketing campaigns. These cookies track visitors across websites and collect information to provide customized ads.
    Others
    Other uncategorized cookies are those that are being analyzed and have not been classified into a category as yet.
    SAVE & ACCEPT