HomeScienceLoss of tree species has cumulative impact on biodiversity

Loss of tree species has cumulative impact on biodiversity


master mentalism tricks

Atlantic oak woodlands on the west coast of Scotland. Credit Ruth Mitchell

Diseases affecting different UK tree species have been shown to have a multiplying effect on the loss of associated biodiversity, according to new research published in the Journal of Ecology by James Hutton Institute scientists and partners in the UK and Portugal. The research team reveals that the decline of ash and oak trees may affect more species than just the ones that only use oak and ash as their habitat.

In the UK, the common ash hosts 45 species that are only found on ash trees, and sessile and pedunculate oaks host 326 species that are only found on oak trees. However, if both tree species were to be lost, the number of species at risk is 512 due to an additional 141 species that only use oak and ash.

Lead author of the study Dr. Ruth Mitchell, an ecologist within the James Hutton Institute’s Ecological Sciences department, said that “When a plant pest or pathogen kills a plant, particularly when it results in the wide-spread loss of one plant species, it also impacts on those species such as insects, mosses, lichens, mammals, birds and fungi that use that plant species for feeding, for nesting or as a living space.”

“The impact of plant pests and pathogens on associated biodiversity is rarely considered when risk assessments for plant pests and pathogens new to the UK are made.”

“This work shows that such impacts may be considerable, particularly if multiple host plants are lost that support the same biodiversity, as is the case with the number of different diseases currently impacting the UK’s trees.”

Dead oak tree due to acute oak decline. Credit Ruth Mitchell

Many species use ash, oak and other tree species and thus should be resilient to the loss of ash and oak as they can use other tree species.

However, when the researchers looked at 24 mixed ash and oak woodlands within the UK, they found that only 21% of the sites were able to continue to support species that use ash and oak if ash and oak were lost. This was because the other tree species that would support this biodiversity were not present at the site, although the site conditions were often suitable for them to grow.

The authors suggest that in risk assessments, higher impact scores should be given to pests and pathogens affecting hosts occurring with other host plant species already impacted by pests and pathogens.

The work provides further support for a major theme in recent guidance on sustainable forestry, which advocates that species diversity of multipurpose and conservation woodlands should be increased to enhance their resilience.

Dr. Mitchell added that “current pest and pathogen risk assessment approaches that ignore the cumulative, cascading effects shown in this study may allow an insidious, mostly overlooked, driver of biodiversity loss to continue.”

Defra Chief Plant Health Officer, Professor Nicola Spence, commented that “this work reiterates the importance of protecting our native trees. It confirms that the value of our interconnected ecosystems is often more than may immediately meet the eye, and the importance of intelligent woodland management plans to support resilience. Such combinatorial analysis is beneficial to our understanding and further development of available ‘toolkit’.”

Resilience of vertebrate animals in rapid decline due to manmade threats More information: Ruth J. Mitchell et al, Cumulative impact assessments of multiple host species loss from plant diseases show disproportionate reductions in associated biodiversity, Journal of Ecology (2021). DOI: 10.1111/1365-2745.13798 Provided by British Ecological Society

Citation: Loss of tree species has cumulative impact on biodiversity (2021, November 19) retrieved 24 November 2021 from https://phys.org/news/2021-11-loss-tree-species-cumulative-impact.html

This document is subject to copyright. Apart from any fair dealing for the purpose of private study or research, no part may be reproduced without the written permission. The content is provided for information purposes only.

Read The Full Article Here


trick photography
Advertisingfutmillion

Popular posts

Jim Brown, Legendary Actor and Football Star, Dies at 87
Winona Ryder Is Back in Costume In First ‘Beetlejuice 2’
Nicolas Cage Dead by Daylight Gameplay Trailer Revealed at Summer
Superman: Legacy Casting Update: Who Is Testing for Clark Kent
Never Have I Ever Season 4 Episode 5 Review:
The Blacklist Season 10 Episode 17 Review: The Morgana Logistics
Natalia Grace Speaks Out After ID Adopted Orphan Docuseries
Cruel Summer Season 2’s Lisa Yamada on All Things Parker
Conor Maynard Releases Breakthrough New Album
Squid share new album O Monolith: Stream
Diddy, City Girls, and Fabolous Share New Song “Act Bad”
9 Albums Out This Week You Should Listen to Now
Red Hair Is Big for 2023: The Colours, Cuts and
Levi’s Love Letter: Why My 501 Jeans Are Such an
3 Curated Travel Looks
Lori Harvey Shows Off Her Underboob and Abs in an
6 Romance Books to Accompany You Into Summer
Slither Your Way into Gripping Thriller Set Amidst Swampy Outskirts
8 of the Best New Children’s Books: Summer 2023
New Biography and Memoir Books to Read
Making the structure of ‘fire ice’ with nanoparticles: The structure
A stargazer’s guide to managing light pollution
Living in an almshouse boosts life expectancy: Living in an
A Rare Form of Dementia Can Unleash Creativity
Netflix Rolls Out Profile Transfer Feature to All Users: Details
The Surgeon General Is Pushing for a Misguided Social Media
HBO Max, Netflix, Disney+, and the Day Streaming Died
The Physics of ‘Sniping’ for Gold